Current:Home > InvestJudge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children -Infinite Edge Capital
Judge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children
View
Date:2025-04-17 14:50:53
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A North Dakota law banning gender-affirming care for children will continue to be enforced pending a court challenge, but any kids whose treatments began before the law took effect in April 2023 can keep getting the care, according to a judge’s ruling released Wednesday.
Judge Jackson Lofgren denied a preliminary injunction sought by families seeking to overturn the law, as he had previously done in November when the plaintiffs sought a temporary restraining order.
The plaintiffs said a grandfather clause in the law is so vague it led providers to stop treatments in the state, but the judge made clear those minors can continue any medical care they had before the law took effect.
It isn’t clear that the plaintiffs are “substantially” likely to win their case, now scheduled for a November trial, on claims that the law violates rights to parent or to personal autonomy and self-determination, the judge said.
He also sided against claims that the grandfather clause is unconstitutionally vague, and that the plaintiffs have shown irreparable harm. With the current law in effect for more than a year now, Lofgren said “the public interest in maintaining the status quo weighs against granting a preliminary injunction.”
The law took immediate effect when Republican Gov. Doug Burgum signed it in April 2023 after overwhelming approval by the GOP-controlled legislature. It makes it a misdemeanor for a health care provider to prescribe or give hormone treatments or puberty blockers to a transgender child, and a felony to perform gender-affirming surgery on a minor.
“The longer this law is allowed to remain in effect, the more North Dakota kids and families will be harmed by the state’s unfair, unjust, and unconstitutional denial of the essential and life-saving health care they need,” Gender Justice Senior Staff Attorney Brittany Stewart, who represents the families and a doctor challenging the ban.
Republican state Rep. Bill Tveit, who brought the bill, was pleased with the ruling. He said the law protects children from irreversible procedures.
Opponents said the ban will harm transgender kids who face greater risks of depression, self-harm and suicide, and stressed that no one performs such surgeries in the state.
Despite the exception for children who were receiving treatments before the ban took effect, providers have considered the grandfather clause too vague to risk it, so the plaintiff families have had to travel out of state to get gender-affirming care for their children, Gender Justice said.
The judge disagreed, writing that such children “can receive any gender-affirming care they could have received in North Dakota prior to the Health Care Law’s enactment.”
Gender Justice agreed that the clarification “paves the way for providers to resume care for these patients in North Dakota.”
“However, significant barriers to access will remain for most or all children and families seeking care in North Dakota, as doctors who stopped providing care to transgender youth may hesitate to resume care due to concerns over the serious legal threats posed by the law,” the organization’s statement said.
Twenty-five states have adopted bans on gender-affirming care for minors in the past few years, nearly all of them challenged in court. Arkansas is appealing after a court struck down its ban entirely. Courts blocked enforcement of the law in Montana. And the ACLU has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review whether the bans should remain in effect in Kentucky and Tennessee. The high court has allowed the Idaho law to remain in effect while lawsuits proceed.
___
AP writer Geoff Mulvihill contributed to this report from Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
For more AP coverage of LGBTQ+ issues: https://apnews.com/hub/lgbtq-legislation
veryGood! (69)
Related
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Every 'Ghostbusters' movie, ranked from worst to best (including the new 'Frozen Empire')
- Why Mauricio Umansky Doesn't Want to Ask Kyle Richards About Morgan Wade
- United Airlines says federal regulators will increase oversight of the company following issues
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- ‘I will not feed a demon': YouTuber Ruby Franke’s child abuse case rooted in religious extremism
- No. 13 seed Yale stuns SEC tournament champion Auburn in another March Madness upset
- U.K. cracks down on synthetic opioid 10 times stronger than fentanyl causing overdoses in Europe
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Memorial at site of deadliest landslide in US history opens on 10th anniversary
Ranking
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Every 'Ghostbusters' movie, ranked from worst to best (including the new 'Frozen Empire')
- Jackpots: A look at the top 10 Mega Millions, Powerball winners of all time
- Polling places inside synagogues are being moved for Pennsylvania’s April primary during Passover
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Kelly Ripa's Trainer Anna Kaiser Invites You Inside Her Fun Workouts With Daughter Lola Consuelos
- Khloe Kardashian Frees the Nipple in Completely Sheer LBD
- Cameron Diaz and Benji Madden Welcome Baby No. 2
Recommendation
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
Target doubles bonuses for salaried employees after profits jump in 2023
Colorado stuns Florida in 102-100 thriller in NCAA Tournament first round
Princess Kate diagnosed with cancer; King Charles III, Harry and Meghan react: Live updates
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
Kate Middleton Diagnosed With Cancer: Revisiting Her Health Journey
Millie Bobby Brown's 'Stranger Things' co-star will officiate her wedding
George Santos says he’ll ditch GOP, run as independent, in bid to return to Congress after expulsion